Articles by

vanessa chan

Born in Malaysia and raised in Kuala Lumpur, Vanessa lives in San Francisco and makes a yearly pilgrimage to visit her restaurateur family in Melbourne, Australia. Vanessa moonlights as a dancer, an off-key karaoke singer and a documentarian of provocative human exploits. On off nights, she can be found sipping a gin and tonic in a Tenderloin bar or curled up in bed with Somerset Maugham.

12/18/12 11:00am

San Francisco is a town that celebrates people in all their quirky, peculiar, and eccentric forms. The Urban Profile column tells the stories of the colorful characters that make San Francisco”¦well, San Francisco.

David Jay, or DJ as he likes to call himself, looks much like your typical Mission hipster — tall, brown-haired, on wheels. He’s a good looking guy, and I notice one or two heads turn as he bounds into the coffee shop for our interview. “I’m so sorry I’m late,” he murmurs, flashing a disarming smile. Studying his profile as I buy him a cup of coffee I’m reminded of Rock Hudson, with a twist of Topher Grace from That 70s Show. DJ has the kind of looks and demeanor that would turn heads, start bar fights and generate cat-calling from Castro gays and Marina girls alike.

But DJ wouldn’t be interested in any of that. He is an asexual, an individual who does not experience sexual attraction. He doesn’t think about sex, he doesn’t want sex and thinks that life is perfectly great without it. It is estimated that approximately one percent of the world identifies as asexual, and a large number of whom interact with each other on the Asexuality Visibility and Education Network (AVEN) website and forums, a community DJ founded to bring the asexual community together and put the asexual orientation on the map.

In this issue of Urban Profile, I talk to San Francisco-based DJ, the face of the global asexual community, about growing up asexual, his first and only sexual relationship (and how that was a bust), and what it means to love without sex.

Asexual David Jay in San Francisco

DJ realized he was not interested in sex at the terrifyingly awkward age of 14. He spent high school feeling like an outsider and wondering what was wrong with him. In the midst of avid teenage discussions about who is “hot” versus who is not, DJ, as an asexual, had nothing to contribute. The onslaught of awkward conversations about sex and adulthood from parents, teachers and other well-meaning adults began to stream in and DJ felt more and more isolated.

“Everyone was telling me sex was going to be a really essential part of my evolution into adulthood. Sex was supposed to be the beginning of how I would connect with people. All the images around me of people not being sexual were of people who were broken — people who  couldn’t  get laid, or people who had psychological conditions, or were depressed. And so I assumed that because I  wasn’t  experiencing a great sexual awakening, that I too was broken.”

As demoralizing as this sounds, it is unsurprising.  In a world dominated by sex and sexualization, DJ’s casual admittance that sex is not anywhere near his list of top priorities is shocking to many.  Coming out as an asexual invariably raises a few knee-jerk questions: are you just repressed? Are you secretly gay? Were you abused?

While his parents are understanding (DJ came out to them in his freshman year of college), a lot of people, especially straight women, view DJ’s asexuality as both a threat, and in some cases, a challenge to overcome. It is not uncommon for people to assume that he simply needs the “right” relationship to summon sexual interest.

In 2006 DJ was invited to a panel with the ladies of ABC’s  The View. In the clip embedded below, one of the screeching middle aged hosts, Joy Behar, tried her very best to eviscerate him.

“Is it [asexuality] a problem?”
“If you’re not having sex what is there to talk about? I don’t understand.”
“Maybe it’s just repressed sexuality.”
“Do you have sex with yourself?”
“Are you just too lazy?”

Despite the fact that asexuals do not experience sexual desire, the human desire for partnership, relationships and human companionship is strong. While sex is of course only one part of meaningful relationship, in a world that views sex as an indispensable part of the relationship equation, asexuals are often left to conclude that if they don’t have sex, they cannot be in a relationship. Naturally, loneliness is a recurrent issue for asexuals who, before online forums like AVEN existed, often wondered if they were the only person in the world who did not experience sexual attraction.

DJ himself is in a romantic relationship with another asexual person, or ace, for short. He says she is “asexy,” an adjective used to describe an asexual person showing intelligence, confidence, style, physical attractiveness and a charming personality. His eyes sparkle when he talks about her.

“She is really emotionally open and rich and caring. After we met, we realized we had found a dynamic that we are looking for in our lives and we wanted to explore it.”

It was the most intellectual way I had heard a woman described, and yet somehow so romantic.

Asexual David Jay at the corner of Haight and Ashbury with a slice of cake with white frosting and a little strawberry on top, symbolizing celebration, the asexual community’s answer to the LGBT rainbow.

One little known factoid about the asexual community — the symbol of the community is an icon graphic of a slice of cake with white frosting and a little strawberry on top, symbolizing celebration, the asexual community’s answer to the LGBT rainbow.

Like most asexuals, DJ craves intimate, physical touching that is distinctly non-sexual. He loves cuddling, specifically what he calls the “high-energy back touch,” which is really scratching on the back. He describes the mechanics of touching and cuddling for asexuals.

“For sexual folks, when things get more energetic and frantic like it does with back touching and scratching, it is moving towards sex. However in the asexual world, because there is no sex, when things get more energetic, it isn’t really moving anywhere and isn’t culminating in a sexual act. So if you don’t pay attention, the cuddling can go on for six hours and you don’t get any sleep. There is no natural conclusion point.”

Even though DJ is now in a fulfilling relationship with a fellow asexual, he has experimented with sexuality before, which he tells me is common in the asexual community. While sex isn’t something an asexual is drawn to, it is something he or she could be willing to compromise on, and engage in, for the sake of a strong, intimate relationship.

Kind of like the way my long-suffering boyfriend endures weekend marathons of Bravo’s Real Housewives of Atlanta with me? Exactly, he says.

Members of AVEN, the Asexuality Visibility and Education Network

Members of AVEN, the Asexuality Visibility and Education Network

Given that it isn’t his favorite way to pass time, what would drive DJ through down the rabbit hole of sex?

“At one point, I thought the only way to get a partner would be to have a relationship with a sexual person. And since I don’t desire sex, I had no way of consenting, so I made a long checklist of things that need to be true in a relationship before I experiment with sexuality. A year later, I found myself in a relationship where all those conditions were met so I said, okay, put on my waders and went in.”

Considering he described becoming sexual as “putting on waders” I asked if the sex was weird.

“It  felt like an out-of-body experience.  It was intellectually fascinating and really alien.”

Well that  didn’t  work out, I laugh.  He smiles in that disarming way again. “Sex is not my thing.” And the question on everyone’s mind, does DJ masturbate? He nods in the affirmative.

“Yes. Most asexual people masturbate. Although asexuals do not experience sexual attraction, we do experience sexual response and our bodies do react. Masturbation is something that feels good with your body, asexual or not. Asexuals just don’t feel an intrinsic desire to make sex and masturbation a part of how we connect with people. It is a bodily function we use it for letting off steam and reducing stress.”

In fact, research by Dr. Lori Brotto, assistant professor in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the University of British Columbia and one of the leading academics in the field of asexuality, confirms what DJ says. Asexual men are as likely to masturbate as men with “normal” sex drives, which suggests that masturbation is a response to a physical imperative, not a sexual one. Similarly, Brotto’s research indicated that asexual women’s vaginal response to physical sexual stimulus is the same as that of sexual women.

Asexual David Jay in San Francisco

So where does the asexuality movement and the community he has built go from here? DJ tells me there is far more work to be done. The movement is becoming more global and he continues his community building work, training other young asexuals worldwide to be spokespeople and bring more awareness to the community.

DJ is also passionate about changing the way asexuality is defined in the medical community.  Despite being identified as a sexual orientation by academicians and  AVEN, asexuality is currently listed in medical journals as the mental disorder “hypo-active desire disorder,” something that DJ and  AVEN  are battling hard against. He also wants to alter existing frameworks of mental health. Think about it — a  key step that mental health professionals look for in the recovery process is to find a way for the patient to be able to date and be sexual, which excludes the possibility that a patient may be asexual.

All said and done though, DJ’s ultimate bucket list goal is much less lofty.

“I want to compete in a dance-off with Mark Zuckerberg. It would be so awkward and so much fun.”

Now that’s sexy.

Get in touch with the author @mmmagpie.

09/14/12 11:41am

The Rice Rockettes.

Drag queens are a dime a dozen in San Francisco, towering feats of glitter, perfume, fake eyelashes and falsettos. But Asian drag queens are much rarer. In this issue of Urban Profile, I get to sit down with Lychee Minnelli, an accomplished Asian queen who has been doing the rounds in pageantry and performance not just in San Francisco, but nationally. Lychee is a member of SF’s only all-Asian drag troupe, the Rice Rockettes, who have taken the world by storm, shocking TV audiences by qualifying to audition for America’s Got Talent  and delighting their Bay Area fans by continuing to scare straight tourists who accidentally wind up strolling through the Castro.

When I meet Maveric Vu, Lychee’s boy counterpart, for our interview, he looks nothing like a drag queen. In jeans, a t-shirt and sporting a little day-old fuzz on his chin, Maveric looks every bit the gay boy and nothing like the outrageous Lychee Minnelli whose face has been plastered on posters and flyers all over San Francisco.

“Well I used to be shy, you know,”  he tells me. I roll my eyes, but Maveric explains.

“I was the youngest of seven kids  – my parents are Vietnamese and Catholic and don’t believe in birth control  – and when you’re the youngest of such a large family everyone else speaks for you. So I was actually really shy until I took a leadership position in my gay fraternity, and started doing drag. Drag helped me embrace my inner attention whore.”

Based on the photos, it’s hard to believe that beautiful Lychee used to be a train wreck of a queen. Maveric tells me his sister, who came to watch his drag debut at UC Davis, thought he looked like Angelica Huston, significantly past her prime. He tells me he took five hours to put on his makeup.

“I kept making mistakes. It’s like when you’re painting and you mess up so you decide to cover up the mistake with more paint? Same thing. The makeup just got bigger and I didn’t look any better.”

Fast forward to San Francisco in the early 2000s: Maveric, who had some time to kill after breaking up with a boy, decided to use drag as his rebound. On invitation from one of the Rockettes, Estee Longah, Maveric showed up to watch the Rice Rockettes prep for a show.

“There were five queens scattered all over the place. There was makeup, pantyhose and wigs everywhere. It was totally scary and I loved it. The next thing I know, I became one of them and Estee became my drag mother.” 

Drag mother? At this point, Maveric bestows some drag history upon me.

“Drag families are built into houses. The drag system originated in the 1960s, during a time when homosexuality wasn’t accepted. So if you are doing drag you really had to build your own family who would nurture your drag identity. The drag system is built of a family system like mothers, daughters, cousins, sisters, that kind of thing. So there are houses, and I’m in the house of the Rice Rockettes. Drag mothers guide their daughters through the initial shock of becoming a queen.” 

Maveric, lacing up a drag sister’s corset.

I ask Maveric what the drag community thinks of Asian queens. He tells me that they’re are often stereotyped as being “fishy,”  which is drag-speak for being more feminine or womanly.

“Some people believe that if you have a typical Asian build you tend to be more slender, with softer features and therefore more feminine. And in the gay community, there’s a lot of gender role politics involved with being masculine or effeminate. So by virtue of being Asian, that does lend to a more fishy drag, wherein people sometimes loop all Asian queens together as all pretty or tranny, which we  aren’t.” 

While drag sounds like a ball of fun, in fact dating as a drag queen can be a challenge. According to Maveric, because gay culture values masculinity and perceived manliness, certain men have issues with dating drag queens  – men who openly over-step the gender roles and gay social boundaries.

“Lots of men cannot get past the fact that Lychee is a persona and not my entire identity. Some gay men have internalized issues and set ideas about what gender roles are in society and these men find drag queens less sexually appealing because we dress in women’s clothes. In fact one of the silliest questions I get is people wondering if by doing drag, I’m signaling a desire to be a woman.” 

I respond that it might be scary getting into bed with a drag queen.

“Of course! In my room I have wigs all over my walls on frightening mannequin heads. So when I bring guys around I’m usually considerate and ask if they want me to turn the mannequin heads so they face the wall and aren’t watching us while we fool around.” 

In fact, one of his main goals is to create uncomfortable and outrageous situations.

“I want to scare the children. I like to be ridiculous. I like to shake up the mass mentality and change preconceptions of identity. If you want to be a drag queen but you don’t want to be ridiculous and scary, you shouldn’t be a drag queen. I am aggressive and want people to know that Lychee has arrived.” 

Since we’re on the topic of dating, I ask Maveric about tranny and drag chasers. To the uninitiated, tranny chasers are men – straight, gay, bi, it doesn’t matter – who are sexually attracted to men wearing women’s clothes.

“When I am in drag, I feel sexy and powerful but I don’t feel sexual. Lychee is a character: as I put on makeup and get in face I’m putting on my persona. Think about it this way – when a straight actor plays a gay character it doesn’t mean he is necessarily gay. When I am in drag, it’s about my performance and it isn’t sexual so I’m not into that.” 

Ever the pragmatist, Maveric adds:

“Besides, it would be complicated logistically. Do you take off your wig? What if your makeup smears? That’s my excuse to duck a tranny chaser, “No hun, you’ll mess up my lipgloss. Because everyone knows you don’t mess with a drag queen’s makeup.”

As we move away from the politics of drag and into the complex logistics involved, Maveric tells me it now takes him two hours (less than half of what it used to take him) to transform into Lychee. First he covers his eyebrows with wax and draws his eyebrows an inch higher than where they actually are. After that he shaves his face and uses various products to cover the follicles. He inserts either socks or C-cup chicken cutlets for breasts. And finally, Maveric tucks his bits away.

Maveric, mid-face, in the process of becoming Lychee.

One of the most confounding aspects of drag is what is known in “drag-speak”  as “tucking,”  the process of tucking away the male genitalia to create the illusion of a flat, Ken-doll look, down there. Maveric tells me that tucking is quite possibly the worst part about drag. The process is precise, and from the sounds of it, agonizing:

“Before men hit puberty their testicles, which haven’t dropped yet, live in a cavity close to the body. When they drop, the space the balls once occupied still exists. What I do is squat down, do a reach-around and push the balls back up into that cavity. Then I will pull the empty scrotum and my penis back between my butt cheeks. Queens who want a really flat look will tape the whole thing down. But I don’t like to do that, instead, I wear a dance belt which is a really tight, elastic piece of underwear that ballerinas use. Then I wear two layers of dance tights to cover my leg hair – some queens shave, but I don’t – and two layers of stockings on top to smooth it all out. In drag the illusion is you are always half naked, but in actuality I’m wearing at least six layers of clothing.” 

Given what sounds like an incredibly sweaty affair, of course the next question is whether the balls ever pop out of their holding cell? Maveric laughs and proffers the below advice for all aspiring drag queens:

“You just accept, as a reality of drag, that balls have a mind of their own. Sometimes my tuck stays but sometimes it doesn’t, depending on a number of factors – how moist or humid the air is, how sweaty I get performing, the pull of the moon. As queens, we’re more critical of each others’ makeup and things we can control. At the end of the day, we’re all just men in dresses.” 

Get in touch with the author @mmmagpie.

08/03/12 12:39pm

It’s a small world we live in. Urban dwellers in San Francisco may soon find that adage a reality as one Bay Area-based developer wants to take minimalistic living to a whole new level.

Let’s face it. Every San Franciscan has at least one cringe-worthy horror story about apartment living. Every one of us has, at some point, crammed our lives into expensive, closet-sized apartments in sketchy neighborhoods with very horrifying roommates. San Francisco’s vacancy rate is now close to zero and with rents up more than 23 percent year on year according to online real estate listing company Zillow, things are looking far more dire than they ever have.

Patrick Kennedy, a veteran Bay Area developer, wants to help alleviate the city’s housing challenge, by building what he calls “smart spaces”  – energy- and design-efficient micro-apartments in San Francisco, complete with a bathroom, built-in kitchenette and enough space for a couch that folds out into a bed.

In an interview with Untapped Cities, Kennedy describes his ideal space as “entry-level urban living for a car-free household,”  targeted at the huge influx of high-skilled technology workers flooding the city to work at places like Twitter, Zynga and other emerging Web 2.0 companies. Kennedy intends to build these smart spaces in the south and mid-Market Street areas of San Francisco and has two proposed locations on 9th  and Mission and 7th  and Folsom.

A storage unit in Berkeley, CA currently houses what Kennedy calls, Smart Spaces 1.0, a prototype micro-apartment unit that is 160 square feet in total. True to its “smart”  name, every square inch of space serves more than one purpose.  A dining bench with elevated table space shrinks down flat to become a guest bed, the couch folds out into a queen bed, counter tops double as kitchen counters and work desks. Mirrors and a large Bay window work to provide illusions of space.

Veteran developer Patrick Kennedy lounges on a couch that folds out into a queen sized bed. Mirrors enlarge the space.

Each apartment comes with electronics and appliances such as a television, a microwave, a toaster oven and small refrigerator, all of which are neatly tucked away behind sliding door closets. These “smart”  built-ins make 160 square feet of living space seem genuinely livable and at times seemed infinitely less cramped than certain dorm rooms and budget hotels. That said, despite the triple functionality of the built-in furniture, storage space is still limited. Kennedy characterizes his ideal tenant as, “a young techie who come to San Francisco with nothing more than a suitcase, a computer, a toothbrush and a desire to succeed.” 

An “appliance garage” houses a microwave, a toaster and a refrigerator. The closets have sliding doors to save space.

He expounds more on this in a video tour of the prototype (embedded below) on Faircompanies.com, a video blog about sustainable technology.

“Someone asked Aristotle Onassis, what is your secret to being rich? He said, “Two things. Always have a suntan and always have an address in the best part of town even if it’s a broom closet. Now I’m providing the broom closets in the South of Market area, metaphorically speaking.” 

An MIT grad student gave the unit a trial run, living there for just under a month. Her feedback, which included “No”  on the “Euro-style” shower above the toilet that drains right onto the bathroom  floor and complaints about the kitchen sink being too small, will help inform the changes to version 2.0.

The Euro-style shower received low marks from Smart Spaces’ first inhabitant, an MIT grad student.

The kitchen sink, which also received low marks, is large enough to fit two dinner plates. Kennedy plans to change this in Smart Spaces 2.0.

Kennedy says that Smart Space 2.0 will be a little larger, at 220 square feet and will include bigger sinks in the kitchen and bathroom, an actual stove instead of an induction cooker, a traditional tub-shower bath area and a pull-down Murphy bed.

A model of Smart Spaces 2.0, with a pull-down Murphy bed, a tub and a stove.

Kennedy expects to rent these tiny units for an impressive $1,300 to $1,600 per micro-apartment. While he calls this an “entry level price,”  the stats say otherwise. According to a number of real estate services, the current average monthly rent for a San Francisco studio apartment is $2,075 and the current average size of a studio is 493 square feet. That makes Kennedy’s proposed micro-units nearly 40% more expensive per square foot than the average San Francisco studio apartment, and about a two-thirds smaller. In essence, these tiny, but expensive apartment units effectively target young, single, high-income city dwellers. Per city regulations at least 15 percent of these units will be designated BMR (industry-speak for “below market rate” ) and these would go for $910 a month.

With these rents, I ask him if he thinks this will cause even more pricing pressure on the already stressed rental market in San Francisco. Kennedy disagrees.

“I believe this is a way to relieve a lot of the pressure on single family homes and multi-bedroom apartments that are being bid up and cannibalized by groups of single individuals who have no other place to live and who join households together and bid up the price of all the existing housing. That demographic cohort, both the students and tech workers, could be quite adequately housed in smart spaces or efficiency dwelling units as they call them and not bid up the price of housing for families and lower-income people.” 

Not everyone believes that this trickle-down solution will positively impact low-income and affordable housing rents in San Francisco. Gail Gilman, executive director of the nonprofit developer Community Housing Partnership  told SF Public Press that she was skeptical of that narrative. The publication notes:

“Gilman said for-profit developers want to build smaller units mostly because it’s good for their business. Multifamily housing is less lucrative because there are fewer families that can afford to pay for large apartments at the rates landowners would like to charge per square foot. “I think that’s why for-profit developers prefer smaller units with higher density,”  Gilman said. “They have more of a return on their investment that way.” 

A big part of these micro-units that Kennedy hopes to build is a significant amount of common space for residents to socialize. A good example of this is at the proposed project on 9th  and Mission. The 11-storey building will have 12,000 to 15,000 square feet of common space comprising a 7,000 square foot roof deck, common areas on every floor and 4,000 square feet of lobby areas which will contain banquettes, communal dining areas and work rooms. Although the arrangement seems to ignite visions of college dorm life, Kennedy insists that he isn’t trying to cram a bunch of people into dorm-style living. He wants the residents to have social interactions and chance meetings. He says, “You’re living in a small space but get to live large with other people, right here within your building.” 

In the midst of all this, San Francisco’s notoriously fickle Board of Supervisors has postponed a vote until September 25 on a proposal to amend the city’s building code, to reduce the living space in apartments from 220 square feet to 150 square feet of living space, excluding kitchen, bathroom and closet. While certain to impact his project, Kennedy doesn’t believe it is the be-all, end-all if the proposal does not go through. He will make the tweaks to his Smart Spaces project and remains adamant that the City of San Francisco wants and needs high-density, serviceable micro-dwelling units. He says about his project:

“Not only will [the Smart Spaces project] help ease the housing crunch in SF, it would also add a huge number of MUNI riders to the city’s public transit revenue, add a lot of valuable property to the tax roll and be good for local businesses because these units put a lot of people in an area that doesn’t have a large residential component. These new arrivals would be the new breed in the SOMA area.” 

This emerging trend of micro-apartments is certainly not unique to the City by the Bay. Space-starved Tokyo, the same city that debuted capsule hotels a few years ago has introduced 30 square meter (approximately 323 square feet) parking lot-sized single family homes to support city living in a stagnant economy. In July 2012, New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg invited developers to participate in a contest to design micro-apartments measuring 275 to 300 square feet.

While all of this is certain to generate angry protestations from progressive housing rights activists, in some ways these kinds of developments are inevitable. As Kennedy says:  “Many people will take 220 square feet in San Francisco compared to 2,200 square feet in another city.” 

All photographs by Carlo De La Cruz.

Get in touch with the author @mmmagpie.

06/28/12 1:12pm

San Francisco is a town that celebrates people in all their quirky, peculiar, and eccentric forms.  In this  Urban Profile column we tell the stories of the colorful characters that make San Francisco….well,  San Francisco.

I met Jacki at a dance class three years ago. I remember noticing two things about her right off the bat. The first was a large, u-shaped scar on her chest that she made no effort to hide, and the second was just how open and upfront she was about…well, everything. Within minutes of meeting her, I learned that Jacki is, in her own words, a fetish video producer (more on this later), and that a few years prior she had had a life-saving lung transplant (hence the scar) born of a rare respiratory illness.

But first, who is Jacki and what does she do? Quite simply, this Bay Area native is a producer of farting videos. Her videos, which are posted on various fetish-exclusive sites are downloaded and paid for by hundreds of consumers. These video clips, featuring Jacki in various stages of undress, farting noisily into the camera, fulfill a niche community of men who get off on women farting. Yes, you read right. Men watch her fart and tell her how hot she is, how hard they are for her and her farts, and how much they want her to sit on their faces and fart on them.

Fetish isn’t something new to Bay Area folks. As a city that celebrates nudity, ass-less chaps, Kink.com and the Folsom Street Fair, San Franciscans are generally unfazed by what our more conservative counterparts call “sexual perversion.” But Jacki, my girl-next-door friend does not fit the typical profile of a San Francisco sexual deviant. With her fresh-faced cheeriness, completely unblemished skin (no tattoos, no piercings) and Euro-chic dress sense, Jacki looks like the furthest thing from a fetish girl. She jokes:

“When people hear that I’m in the fetish business they think latex, S&M, piercings and dominatrix whipping stuff. Seriously Suicide Girls is so 1998. We’ve moved on to farting people!” 

Jacki’s foray into the world of fetish started in 2003, and as most things do, innocently enough. Jacki, at the time a fairly prolific ballet dancer, wanted to sell a pair of twice-used ballet shoes on eBay. She put them up for online auction, and the next thing she knew, a torrent of foot fetishists were engaged in a bidding war over her shoes. Surprised but unfazed, Jacki quickly recognized a business opportunity, one for which she would become globally famed.

From 2003 to 2007, Jacki periodically sold fetish items on the internet: shoes, socks, used underwear (yes, used underwear is sold as a fetish item outside of the infamous Japanese underwear vending machines!). Although a fairly successful fetish provider, Jacki considered herself a hobbyist at first. The sales provided her a side income, but starting out, Jacki didn’t pursue this to support herself. She still held her job at a real-estate investment banking firm, living (for all intents and purposes) a relatively normal life.

In 2007, disaster struck. Jacki found herself constantly out of breath, fatigued and unable to work. Eventually diagnosed with a rare lung disease called idiopathic pulmonary hypertension, Jacki was told that she needed a lung transplant. While waiting to get on the transplant list, and then waiting for an organ match, she lost her job and the medical insurance that went with it.

Faced with the desperate prospect of not being able to afford her own insurance and $15,000 per annum in additional specialty medication and expensive co-pays for hospital visits, Jacki could have given up. But ever the entrepreneur and optimist, she did not dwell on the failings of the U.S. healthcare system (although fail it did). Instead, Jacki realized that she would have to give her fledgling forays into fetish a full-time shot. As a seller of fetish items, Jacki had a flexibility that most nine-to-fivers would give an arm and a leg for.

“It was a job I could do on my own, in my own time, wherever I wanted and stop whenever I wasn’t feeling well. I found myself   making more money that I did with any other more ‘respectable’ job I’ve ever had.” 

The pair of used ballet shoes that started it all

Immersing herself full time in the world of selling fetish items, Jacki quickly became highly sought after. She soon transitioned her business from selling used items such as shoes and underwear (and tempting fate by shipping these items with the US Postal System) to filming and selling only fetish videos on the internet, her specialty being fart videos.

Her videos, which average five to ten minutes in length, can be purchased from her website (she requested I withhold the url) and third party sites such as Clips4Sale, the biggest seller of short fetish videos online.

I inquire if there is a plot and script for each video like some porn videos have. She tells me it is a lot simpler than porn, and that the vast majority of her videos are candid and off-the-cuff. She simply turns on the camera, tells her virtual viewers just how badly she needs to fart, and lets it rip. She says it is that very sense of spontaneity that appeals to her clientele–they revel in the idea that someone accessible is doing something so taboo. They enjoy the fact that Jacki appears to be someone they could bump into at a bar, someone they work with or someone they could date.

At this point during the interview, she looks me in the eye and bestows upon me a choice piece of wisdom:

“All farts are not created equal. Some men like farting girls in underwear, some men only like white underwear farts, some like thongs, some hate thongs, some like farts through jeans, some like bare-bottom farts, some like women farting on furniture, like chairs, or couches or mattresses.” 

I get it, like any other business, it’s about knowing your customer.

Of course when talking to an expert on farting, I have to ask the question, what foods induce the best farts? You’d think it would lots of bean burritos, but no, the key is sugar-free candy. According to my farts-pert friend, any candy that comes in a sugar-free form such as Worthers or Twizzlers, or sugar-free cough drops are the secret to monster whopper farts. These candies contain sugar substitutes such as isomalt, malitol and sorbitol which, if eaten in excess, can even go so far as to induce “wet”  farts. Dieting candy-guzzlers, be very afraid.

I ask if she has other fart-inducing dietary tips.

“Kashi cereal. I had some this morning, and now I’ve got so much gas!”  she groans. “Raw cabbage will do it too, but who wants to eat raw cabbage?” 

I have to say, I agree.

Sipping drinks at a financial district bar with Jacki, I’ll admit that visualizing guys beating off to my 5’2″ friend farting away on the internet can be disconcerting. I quite easily profiled these men as creepy and  odd, the scrum of society. Not so much. According to Jacki, her clientele in this niche society of about 3,000 consumers worldwide are quite “normal.”

“They could be any guy in this bar. My customers represent the whole broad spectrum of society–there are weirdos, normal people, dads, boyfriends, white, black, Asian”¦it’s a bell curve, a cross-section of society really.” 

By San Francisco’s social norms, for the most part we’ve come to accept more “mainstream”  fetishes like spanking or bondage. But farting? I ask Jacki how she thinks an obscure fetish like farting gets developed. She doesn’t know. According to her empirical research, (i.e. conversations with her clients) she says the fetish  develops through some sort of childhood memory. “One client told me of a particular moment when he was at a birthday party and some girl farted. For some reason that imprinted in his memory and as an adult, he has always been turned on by farting women.” 

The appeal of female farting also may have a lot to do with the taboo aspect of farting and women. Let’s face it, with farting, it’s a man’s world. Women aren’t allowed to excrete bodily fluids or fart; it’s unladylike for a woman to actually have bodily functions while men can create a veritable orchestra of multi-octave farts in the next room. As Jacki says very eloquently,

“Female farting is the final frontier of morality. People react so strongly to the admittance that women fart, while men can fart as much as they want.” 

Unsurprisingly, as with many social taboos, the secrecy of female farting has created an allure that fuels the fetish, and in turn, Jacki’s business.

The demand for fart videos is hot and recession-proof partly due to the limited numbers of producers who do what Jacki does. 3,000 global consumers have to share the combined content of ten to 15 active video producers who post new videos on a weekly basis. While constant demand is always good for business, Jacki tells me it is a very isolating profession. Obviously, it is not something she can bring up in casual conversation. And unlike other types of work or art, it isn’t easy to find collaborators or people to swap ideas with it.

“It’s weird – you would think it’s so easy. People get together to do all sorts of collaborations like record songs and write emo shit, you’d think farting together wouldn’t be a big deal. But people find what I do distasteful,”  she tells me, sounding a bit testy.

I tell her I’d fart on camera with her, except that I wouldn’t be able to keep a straight face for the camera and would fail miserably.

“Oh no problem, there’s a fetish for farts and giggles.” 

I love it. There’s a sub-category for every fart fetish.

As we get ready to turn off the tape recorder, I ask her what motto she lives by and she flashes me her winning smile.

“If you have a sense of humor about farting, you’ll stay young.” 

Get in touch with the author @mmmagpie.

03/12/12 7:45pm

Last month the Kabuki Hotel in Japantown played host to the 10th  annual SF MusicTech Summit. Founded by entrepreneur Brian Zisk, the summit defines itself as the “world’s leading business-to-business idea marketplace on the confluence of Internet, technology and music,”  where thought leaders in music and technology gather to share ideas.

Here are our roving reporter’s three favorite panels.

Future of Music Coalition
The big question this panel was trying to answer: “Is technology really, really helping musicians make money?” Kristin Thomson, education director at national nonprofit  Future of Music Coalition (FMC) presented findings from a study conducted by the organization to investigate the real effect of technology on musicians’ bank accounts.

Over the past 18 months, FMC has collected information from a diverse set of US-based musicians and composers about the ways that they are currently generating income from their recordings, compositions or performances, and whether or how this has changed over the past ten years. The project has employed three methodologies: in-depth interviews with more than 25 different types of musicians (from jazz performers, to classical players, TV and film composers, Nashville songwriters, rockers and hip hop artists); financial snapshots that show individual artists’ revenue pies in any given year; and a wide-ranging online survey in fall 2011 that captured information from a diverse array of US-based musicians and composers.

So…is Spotify a musician’s savior or nightmare?

As is often the case, the answer wasn’t a simple yes or no. It’s a resounding, “Maybe.” The majority-54% of the 5,000 respondents-said they had not generated income from interactive streaming services: Rhapsody, Spotify, MOG, Rdio, Slacker and so on. Yet overall,  the majority said that emerging technology has had a positive impact on musicians’ careers and revenue streams by allowing musicians to more effectively communicate with fans, manage their careers, promote and collaborate with other musicians.

Interestingly enough, the study found that musicians who engage with technology are in fact making less money than those who choose to stay out of the technology playing field. That is, musicians who aren’t trying to directly interact with their fans through the internet, such as section players in orchestras are making more money than musicians selling their music digitally. SF Weekly put it best, “So perhaps, if you want to make a decent living as a musician, consider shelving your Bob Dylan vinyl and resuming your Chopin studies.” 

“Meet the New Boss, Worse than the Old Boss” 
David Lowery, guitarist, vocalist and songwriter for the bands Cracker and Camper van Beethoven gave an interesting (albeit poorly attended) talk about the current state of music. While much of the day’s discussion had been a congratulatory pat-on-the-back talk about how the current business model is good for music and musicians, Lowery took a contrarian view that digital music is destroying artists. While much of his evidence was anecdotal (largely based on his own experiences as a musician in both the old and new models), he made a couple interesting points. Under the “old”  label model, musicians made 20-25% of sales, while assuming little or none of the costs and risks. However, under the “new”  digital model, while a musician now expects to receive about 65% when selling a recording through iTunes, Amazon and the like, they are now responsible for 100% of the cost and, as such, the associated risk with the recording. They have to put up their own capital for all recording, mixing, mastering, studio musicians, promotion and marketing costs, which means shouldering all the associated risk. Additionally, he noted that artists are now expected to also pay the costs of touring and live performances. All of this  makes the net monetary gain for the musician less than under the new digital model despite getting a larger cut of the sales.

According to Lowery:

“[iTunes and Amazon] put up zero capital and zero risk and they get 30% of the gross in return. At least the old record label system shared some of the risk! Wow the old labels were not so evil compared to the new labels. So essentially THE NEW BOSS in the new model is iTunes and Amazon (also indirectly Google). And THE NEW BOSS is actually more greedy than the old boss.”

Following this, Lowery joined a panel discussion with BMI, SoundExchange, TuneCore and others that turned fiery over the heated issue of just how artists get paid.

The Licensing Landscape
Lowery’s “old boss, new boss”  prelude on how musicians today are worse off  than their predecessors was roundly rebutted on this panel by Jeff Price, president of digital music distribution service TuneCore. Price noted that the vast majority of music is now created, recorded, distributed and enjoyed outside the major label scheme (TuneCore alone distributed a million newly recorded tracks in 2011, versus 4,000 newly recorded tracks by all major labels combined). That said, the panel became very heated when Price took an ax to the existing music licensing practices for the sometimes up to two-and-half year waits that artists have to tolerate in order to get paid by labels like BMI or ASCAP.

“How fucking hard is it to give them their money?  We should be in favor of anything that makes it easier, quicker and more transparent for artists to get paid.”

BMI’s Michael Drexler took exception to Price’s vocal arguments, which set off a heated debate around the inefficiency of the traditional collection societies (ASCAP, BMI, SESAC, et al) in collecting royalties from digital media. Price’s voice seemed to be the dominant one in this panel, and his message was primarily about how companies like Tunecore allow artists to make more off their properties by being full-service distributors directly collecting digital royalties. To counter this, Drexler said BMI wants to move from quarterly to monthly accounting to hasten payments to rightsholders.

Clearly the internet and the digitalization of the music industry has changed-and by changed I mean democratized-the landscape significantly, and given more musicians access to fans. But in that same vein, the “new boss,” the internet, has thrown a tough  curve ball  to working musicians by making it far harder to live off a career in music. While the panels were informative in their own way, the summit did little to answer the question on all musicians’ minds, “How can musicians make money in the new business model?”  It looks like we’ll need more than a tech summit to solve this conundrum.

Follow Untapped Cities on  Twitter  and  Facebook. Get in touch with the author @mmmagpie.

Alan Williams  also contributed to this article. Alan is a trombonist, composer and arranger  based in San Francisco.

01/20/12 11:05am

Something quiet, even subversive, is creeping into the sensibilities and consciousness of fashion’s most eminent. Curvy women, bosomy women, women size 12 and above, once relegated to muumuus and shapeless elastic sweatpants are suddenly more than relevant, and dare I say, closing the gap that exists between the runway and the regular woman. Perhaps it’s born of a Mad Men-esque nostalgia heralding back to an idealized femininity from a different time. Perhaps it’s the fact that the majority of women are not a size 0, 2 or 4 but actually a size 14 and above. Women the world over are taking a stand. They are speaking with their blogs, voices and dollars and forcing the fashion industry to respond. Unlike a few years ago, curvy women are being released from fashion’s  fringes.

Christina Hendricks’ role as Joan Holloway on the series hit Mad Men has helped curves become vogue again.

Sure, the majority of runway models are still a size 00 and Rachel Zoe and her protruding collarbone continues to grace our TV screens. But at the same time, Christina Hendricks and her buxom, hour-glass figure has created a multitude of fans craving the Mad Men-styling of Hendricks’ portrayal of Joan Holloway. Outspoken, plus-size (to use the industry’s marketing-sanctioned word for women above a size 10) supermodel Crystal Renn has created not just a place for, but a demand for plus-size models-acclaimed designer Jean Paul Gaultier walked then size-16 Renn down his runway to showcase his Spring 2006 collection.

Size 16 plus-size model Crystal Renn and Jean  Paul Gaultier walk the runway to showcase the designer’s Spring 2006 collection.

Fashion magazines responded. Glamour received hordes of positive reviews when, in 2009, the magazine ran a small picture of a 5-foot-11, 180-pound model Lizzie Miller, comfortably exposing her paunch.

Not to be outdone, both Vogue Italia and V Magazine published issues featuring large models in skin-baring outfits. Marie Claire engaged a monthly plus-size columnist.

Blogs dedicated to curvy fashion are popping up every day and gaining both the attention and esteem of the notoriously size-ist fashion community. Retailers are responding in tandem. In addition to plus-size retailers Torrid and Lane Bryant, straight size retailers such as Forever 21, ASOS and The Limited have also released complementary plus size clothing lines.

Little by little, Karl Lagerfeld’s hurtful dictum that, “No one wants to see curvy women”  is becoming less relevant.

The battle is of course nowhere near won. Plus-size feature articles, beautiful as they are, seem to feature curvy women in lingerie thus implying that curves are sexual, but not necessarily fashionable. Four months after being featured in the spread in V, the April issue of French Elle showed plus-size model Tara Lynn undressed again- this time perched in a wicker chair. Not that I’m against nudity, but the purpose of fashion spreads is to sell clothes, so could they find her nothing to wear that fit?

Most high-end fashion houses, the Pradas and Chanels of the world, continue to relegate plus-size women to the shoes and accessories section since they do not make clothing above a size 6. Fashion runways continue to be a sea of skinny and sample sizes outfitting only the tiny sample of the population that fits sizes 0 to 2.  And in the 2009 cringe-worthy Fox series “More to Love,”  20 women weighing up to 300 pounds competed for the affections of an equally large single man, implying quite simply that heavy women are worthy of the indignities of a dating show but were certainly unworthy of “Bachelor” -looking bachelors.

But this change is coming along. Slowly but surely, the concept of curves is creeping into fashion, and  I know I speak for women the world over when I heave a sigh of relief. Isn’t it about time?

Here at Untapped Cities, we consider it a triumph when we find locals who inspire and who are changing lives. So I knew I had hit the jackpot when I came across a Bay Area””based curvy fashion blogger, Tanesha Awasthi, who has seen her barely 1-year-old blog, Girl with Curves, climb the charts of fashion and curve acceptance in a meteoric way. Tanesha was one of 20 bloggers invited by Tumblr to attend New York Fashion Week last year. She is currently featured on a billboard in Times Square representing Forever 21. She  has also been featured in the New York Times, San Francisco Chronicle and Vogue to name a few. Not bad for a Tumblr blog born out of boredom! Tanesha is quietly leading the charge for curvier women and plus-size acceptance, and I sure as hell am on board. See below for excerpts from an interview I conducted with Tanesha and check out her amazing blog!

Untapped Cities: What inspired you to launch Girl with Curves? What inspires you today?

Tanesha Awasthi: I needed a creative outlet outside of my full-time tech job, and my hubby suggested starting a blog. I hadn’t decided on a topic, but I posted a pic on Flickr, and it ended-up getting re-blogged on Tumblr over 400 times. All of the comments were positive and supportive, while most referred to my curves. It was right then and there that I decided to create a personal style blog, and call it Girl with Curves.

UC: On the rare times that curvier women are featured in media, they tend to be for lingerie/sexy photo shoots (like the recent pieces by Vogue Italia). What’s your opinion on that?

TA: I know, right?!  I think it’s sad and shocking that curvy models aren’t represented in media in the same way that straight-size models are. I truly hope to see curvy women in high fashion spreads one day, as opposed to the overtly sexy spreads we keep seeing lately.

UC: What’s a fashion essential every curvy girl should have?

TA: A tailored blazer!  It does wonders for curves by accentuating the waist, and it can practically go over anything, from a dress, a skirt, to slacks or jeans.

UC: Your clothes always seem to fit well, which is a challenge for curvy girls. What’s your secret?

TA: I try everything on! And when I can’t, I order online from retailers that allow easy returns.  Having curves means that not all brands will fit the same as others, and not all sizes are created equal, so my secret is trying things on, as well as taking risks ordering online.

UC: What do you consider your proudest moment since you started blogging?

TA: Receiving an email from a 12-year-old girl in a different part of the world was definitely a proud moment. Knowing that something so simple as a blog could inspire others, and help girls and women of all ages to feel more confident in their own skin is so fulfilling and like nothing else I’ve ever done. It also means the world to me that so many of my fellow curvy girls have taken an interest in my blog.

UC: What is your goal as a curvy fashion blogger? What do you envision for your future?

TA: My goal is to continue touching lives, making connections with my readers, and spreading body positivity, self-esteem and self-acceptance through fashion. A major goal of mine is to convince straight-sized brands to extend their sizes to fit all body shapes and sizes!

Follow Untapped Cities on  Twitter  and  Facebook. Get in touch with the author @mmmagpie.