3. The Lost I.M. Pei Terminal 6

The I.M. Pei-designed Terminal 6, built in 1970, was designed as an exercise in restraint with an aim towards transparency, the architect sought to “create an environment for travelers that was serene, generous, clear, spacious, simple and dignified,”according to Henry N. Cobb, from Pei Cobb Freed & Partners in New York. Known as the Sundrome, from its conception it was never meant to compete with the audaciousness of the TWA Flight Center. This design decision would ultimately lead, in part, to its demolition in 2011.

View all on one page

15 thoughts on “7 of JFK Airport’s Demolished Jet Age Terminals in NYC

  1. This is a really interesting story. Is there any map available to show the different terminals and what happened to them?

  2. they will alwyas be idlewild, brooklyn battery tunnel, the triborough, tappan zee bridge, etc.! long live the real names, not politicos!

  3. Worldport Terminal 3 and American Airlines Terminal 8 were very significant and sad architectural losses. Kudos to you Michelle for fighting hard for preservation! Thank goodness the TWA Terminal has been saved. It will make a perfect lobby for the hotel. I know the interior is landmarked, but I hope they’re not allowed to alter it in any way, especially that awesome seating area.

    1. The old JFK was a testament to modernist architecture. Go back to 1966 when one flew out of a quanset hut terminal that house TCA, Transcaribbean Airways. Next to it was the Chapel with the madonna on a pedestal.

  4. Your note on the Temporary Terminal has at least one error. You wrote that it was built as Idlwild was becoming JFK, then torn down in 1960. Idlewild was not renamed until 1964. So either the terminal was torn down later or it was not built during the Idlewild/JFK conversion.

    1. Hi Chip! What I have is that Idlewild was renamed New York International in 1948, and then renamed JFK in 1963 after an expansion. In 1960 that structure was demolished because other buildings could take on its function.

      1. Hi Michelle,
        I see – you were referring to the technical name of the airport, which was given to it when the first flights began in July of 1948. But officially, it was actually New York International Airport, Anderson Field. But no one in New York ever referred to it by that name. It was always only Idlewild. And its airport code remained IDL – for Idlewild – until the renaming to JFK at the very end of 1963. By the way, that renaming was not related to an expansion but only in memory of the President. And aside from the politicians who made it, that change was not universally liked in New York.

        1. You make a very good point. We sometimes struggle with how to refer to certain places in NYC – official name, popular name, re-named name. One of the recent ones has been the Hugh L. Carey Tunnel (aka Brooklyn Battery Tunnel). Almost nobody knows it by the official name, so in the text of the article will name both. But in a title, where we want people interested in this tunnel to find it, it’s a hard choice! But then, we don’t want to be called out by being “incorrect” either!

          1. This is my third attempt to reply to your comment, Michelle. This site keeps failing to post it.

            I appreciate your attempt to balance using appropriate and known names with the need to provide good information for everyone. Ilook forward to reading more of your articles.

  5. JetBlue and its partner, a hotel developer, are negotiating for the rights to turn the head house into a hotel. JFK Airport, which was then known as New York International Airport, or Idlewild.

  6. While I am happy to see you have taken the time to remember the beautiful old terminals which used to make JFK Airport special, I’m somewhat confused what your message is, i.e., is JFK airport much better today for having gotten rid of these terminals, or do you believe more could have been done to re-invent/update these terminals for present day needs? I for one consider JFK Airport to be nothing more than a grouping of Ikea warehouses. BORING. No aesthetics whatsoever. Also am confused why you would pick to show a partially demolished Pan Am Worldport terminal which just adds insult to injury to the preservationists who fought hard to have it re-purposed for 21st century needs.

    1. I believe more can be done to have both saved these terminals and to have improved the flight experience today via better architecture. As a writer and photographer, I was part of the movement to save the TWA Flight Center and repurpose it, and was asked directly by the National Trust for Historic Preservation to photograph it in 2011, as they were pushing to get the location turned into a hotel, which it will finally be. I also worked with TWA alums to republish my work on their internal magazine, to raise additional awareness. I also worked with the team saving Worldport at the time to raise awareness for the building before it was demolished. I have shown two photographs of Worldport in this article, to show it in its prime and while it was being demolished.

      You can see these pieces here:



      1. Thank-you for the clarification. Also appreciate the effort you have put in to document/photograph JFK’s beautiful old terminals and for giving this media air-time!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *